6

iStock 000008282776Large 299x299 Forewarned On FourSquareA guy walks into a bar and asks the bartender for a drink.  The bartender replies, “Sure, hold on one minute.  I just need your name and home address first,” and then snaps a quick photo.  The patron thinks this is strange, but he’s been drinking at this bar for ten years and knows the owner personally, so he’s not too concerned and gives him the info.  The bartender then pulls out his smart phone and taps away for about a minute, then puts it down and serves the drink.  Curious, the guy asks the bartender what he was doing.  ”Oh, that’s our new policy.  Every time a customer enters the bar, we post your name, photo and address on a gigantic billboard on the highway so that thousands of people know exactly where you are right this second.  It’s great advertising for us!”

Sounds a little ridiculous, right?  Welcome to the latest social media rage – geo-locating.  All across the country, retailers and restaurateurs are jumping on to the FourSquare bandwagon, intoxicated by visions of viral marketing and Twitter flash mobs.  On its surface, it sounds like great fun for the participants and nothing but marketing upside for the purveyors.  But as your mom always warned, “It’s all fun and game until someone gets hurt.”  There is a dark side to this technology and I’m convinced that one day the whole geo-location fad is going to come crashing down in a huge and messy implosion.  Do you want your business to be at the center?

Just Because You’re Paranoid…

…doesn’t mean they aren’t after you.

Here’s my thesis.  Someday in the not too distant future, some degenerate psychopath is going to track an innocent college student using a series of FourSquare (or similar service) updates on her Twitter account, then commit an unspeakable crime.  Think this is unlikely?  Watch this video:

Luckily, this was just a burglary.  I suggest to you that this will not be the last or worst crime committed using social media and automatically (and sometimes unwittingly) broadcasting your whereabouts seems to me to be making it just a little too easy.

Although I’m not willing to put my personal safety and (more likely) that of my belongings at additional risk, there are obviously plenty of people who are.  But this post isn’t focused on the individual users of geo-location.  If the benefits you gain from telling people where you are outweigh the incremental risk of giving criminals a little extra help, then be my guest.  This post is focused on the businesses that participate.

Risk vs. Reward

I’ll be the first to admit that the risk of this happening to your particular business is extremely small.  In the risk management business, risk is calculated by multiplying the likelihood of a particular event occurring by its consequence.  In this case, we have a very low risk with a very high consequence.  Businesses need to make an informed, conscious decision as to whether or not the viral marketing benefits justify the risk.  I’m not saying whether or not they do.  I just don’t hear anybody talking about the risks associated with these services and want to spark the conversation.

My question to businesses participating in services like FourSquare is this: Do you want your business name to be the last Tweet sent by a dead college student and see it spread all over newspaper headlines and cable news broadcasts?

This may sound vile and melodramatic, but I submit to you that the sheer numbers dictate that it is very likely that something similar will happen at some point in the future.  The questions are:

  • Do you want your business name associated with such an incident?
  • Regardless of whether or not your business is criminally liable, what do you think will happen in a civil lawsuit?  Is this what you want to spend your time doing?
  • What will happen to the market for geo-location after such an incident?

So let me know… am I being paranoid?  I’m interested to hear from the users and merchants, especially if this kind of scenario doesn’t bother you.

Similar Posts:

  • Rune Reppenhagen

    I can understand that someone is concerned about someone breaking in at their home because everyone will knows where you are because you post on foursquare, facebook, etc. where you are at all time.

    I am not so concerned about this, I have been posting on Facebook for years about my travels and have recently started using foursquare. I am not worried about people breaking into my  house when I am gone. How can people know that nobody else is in my house at the moment, or that my neighbor is looking after it for me while I am gone. Furthermore, I may have an alarm system or a video monitoring system that will alert me as soon as someone enters my house?

    I would like to hear others opinions…

  • Jon DiPietro

    Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Rune.  The angle that I’m considering is the other direction…  What happens to the coffee shop who provides incentives for people to use these services, and then personal harm comes to a patron as a direct result.  I’m picturing a lawyer getting the owner on the stand and making them look like a reckless, negligent, cold-hearted, profit-seeking ogre who should be made an example of.

  • Mike Boudreaux

    I think you’re being a bit paranoid here. It is hard to stalk geolocation users based on a single location. Users would need to update several locations in order to be stalked. If you’re worried about making your customers making their identity public, then are you similarly concerned about having them wear name-badges at conferences or social mixers?

    Also, as long as users opt-in to the service, it seems like companies that promote the services are in the clear. It’s when companies give away personal information without their customers agreeing to it that you can get into trouble(example: Google Buzz).

    On the other hand, there are a lot of personal risks that users of geolocation services need to consider. It can be a bad idea to broadcast your location while on an extended trip away from home, but as Rune mentioned there are other security measures that you can take to protect yourself. Ultimately, it’s a personal decision based on a variety of factors, including the level of risk that you can personally tolerate. A single bachelor might be willing to bear more personal risk than somebody with a family to protect.

  • Juliann Grant

    I can see your concern Jon, and have thought alot about whether or not I want to share my geo-location with others.  I am experiementing with FourSquare, and right now it’s just fun.  It hasn’t gotten to the point where I’m checking in places and I’m contacted by that company, but I can see how it can go in that direction.  A local town near me (North Andover) is running a Four Square Day tomorrow where stores and restaurants will be keyed into who’s on FourSquare in their area.  Like Rune, there is often someone home when I am sharing my FourSquare location.  But I do put alot of thought into whether or not I want to post beforehand. 

    To your point..sure, some insane person could take this information to a level that will cause fear, uncertainty and doubt, but we can’t live in fear.

    I suspect FourSquare will evolve like everything else and tighten security for users.  I will say I am getting some strange friend requests on FourSquare though.   Makes me wonder a bit more.  I’ll continue to stumble blindly until I figure out the right balance for me.

  • Elizabeth Coughlin

    You are absolutely correct. This has a number of problematical situations just waiting to happen (statistically and legally). The most individually dangerous to me, is the obvious waiving of 4th amendment rights, which is privacy, search and seizure, etc. Was that Arnold, Sharon Stone “Red Sonya” movie a scenario where one could not escape continuous detection? Good of you to alert people to this.

  • Nathanael

    You’ve identified a real risk. From the outset, privacy has been a (the?) concern of online social networks. This is the same issue, but with different consequences. As a business, I am very concerned: I don’t mind what people do on these networks, but I have real qualms helping them broadcast where they are. I’m relatively comforted by the fact that the companies producing these services have an interest in not being on CNN:’hideous crimes’, but that’s not enough to make me run into their arms.

    Read Postman’s Technopoly for more.